Fleet typeIdentity
Owner-operator
1 power units. Brokers price each fleet type apart.
Carrier profile · USDOT 3945461 · MC-1466620
LUXURY FLEURS INC
1 power unitsavg 7.4 yrRegional · 4 statesLAKE ELMO, MN
CARRIER ACTIVEMC-1466620 ACTIVE
Observed fleet · trailing 24 mo daily
1Power units
9 observed · MCS-150
—Trailers seen
None observed · 24 mo
7.4Avg age (yr)
2007–2024 · vPIC
Click to see how we scored it
Load decision · FMCSA snapshot · 2026-06-30
Clear to load
Active authority and a clean federal record. No blocking issues found.
Active operating authorityInsurance on fileDriver out-of-service rate above average
Operating authority33 yr active
since 2022Insurance (BIPD)On file
FMCSA L&IVehicle OOS · 24mo12.512.5 %
▼ 22.26% nat'lCrashes · fatal00
clean 24 moVektor intelligence · beyond the federal recordProprietary signals computed from VIN-decoded inspections & daily FMCSA snapshots
Fleet age vs peersTypical
7.4 yr
Model years 2007–2024 · peer benchmark computing.
Identity stabilityStable
3 yr unchanged
Same registration since 2022 — no chameleon / reincarnation signal.
AI readFull read
Is LUXURY FLEURS INC safe to work with?
Is LUXURY FLEURS INC safe to load? LUXURY FLEURS INC (USDOT 3945461, MC-1466620) is an active owner-operator motor carrier based in LAKE ELMO, MN, operating 1 power unit and 1 driver. Operating authority has been active 3 years (past the 24-month broker-confidence threshold). Across 17 roadside inspections, its vehicle out-of-service rate is 12.5% (below the 22.26% national average), with 0 reportable crashes in the last 24 months. FMCSA has not assigned a safety rating. Vektor rates it clear to load (94/100). Source: FMCSA SAFER/MCMIS, last updated 2026-06-30.
FMCSA fields + Vektor analysis · updated 2026-06-30
LFLUXURY FLEURS INC 94
01
Safety
17 inspections · 24 mo · vs national benchmarks
Out-of-service rate· trailing 24 months vs national benchmark
Vehicle OOS 12.5% (24-mo)8 veh insp · 24-mo · nat'l 22.26%
050%nat'l 22.26%
Driver OOS 7.1% (24-mo)14 drv insp · 24-mo · nat'l 6.67%
030%nat'l 6.67%
OOS trajectory· trailing 6-mo vehicle-OOS rate vs national
9.1% now▼ Improving
Inspection coverage· expected vs observed · the fraud signal
Inspection coverage
How heavily FMCSA inspects this fleet for its size — it tells you how much to trust the safety signals above. Thin coverage on a young authority is a fraud signal nobody else surfaces.
Under-inspected
Expected
Well-monitored
Heavily inspected
≈7.0 / unit·yr
thin signalabundant signal
Among the more heavily-inspected carriers for its size — abundant roadside signal. Coverage isn't the question here; the out-of-service and crash record is.
- Registered power units
- 1
- Inspections · 24 mo
- 14
- Annualized
- ≈7 / yr
- Coverage
- ≈7.0 inspections / unit · yr
Violation themes· decoded · grouped by BASIC
What this carrier actually gets cited for — FMCSA violation codes decoded into plain English, ranked by frequency.
- 392.2 State/local traffic law violation (speeding, etc.)Unsafe Driving10
- 390.21 USDOT number marking on vehicleUnsafe Driving4
- 391.41 No / expired medical certificateDriver Fitness3 · 1 OOS
- 395.8 Record of duty status (log / ELD) not current or missingHOS Compliance2 · 1 OOS
- 393.75 Tires (defective / underinflated / worn)Vehicle Maintenance2 · 1 OOS
- 393.9 Inoperative required lampsVehicle Maintenance1
- 393.95 Emergency equipment (extinguisher, triangles)Vehicle Maintenance1
- 393.11 Required lamps/reflectors missingVehicle Maintenance1
02
Authority & insurance
Can they legally + adequately haul your load?
Operating authority· 49 CFR · per type
Operating authority
- Common
- Active
- Contract
- None
- Broker
- None
Insurance & bonds
BIPD / liability (required)Filed with FMCSA
CargoNone
Surety bond (BMC-84)None
Insurance continuity· insurer · policy · lapses
$750k BIPD · 6 insurers · 0 lapsesInsurer churn
+5 earlier
National · 23–25
20222025
No BIPD policy is currently in force in the filing history. The authority record may still list one on file — request a COI to confirm current coverage.
6 insurer eras · collapsed from 17 filings
| Insurer | Period | Limit | Renewals |
|---|---|---|---|
| ACCREDITED SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY | Dec 2025 → Dec 2025 | $750k | 4 |
| UNITED FINANCIAL CASUALTY COMPANY | Dec 2025 → Jan 2026 | $750k | 2 |
| GEICO MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY | Apr 2025 → Dec 2025 | $750k | 2 |
| PROGRESSIVE PREFERRED INSURANCE CO. | Feb 2025 → Apr 2025 | $750k | 1 |
| NATIONAL INDEMNITY COMPANY | May 2023 → Feb 2025 | $750k | 5 |
| EVERSPAN INSURANCE COMPANY | Oct 2022 → Feb 2023 | $750k | 3 |
03
Equipment & fleet
VIN-decoded · NHTSA vPIC
Capacity· power units = haulable capacity; trailers are towed
- Registered power units (MCS-150)
- 1
- Observed power (24 mo)
- 9
- Trailers (towed)
- 0
Capacity is power units only — trailers are towed equipment and are never summed into a fleet-size figure.
Fleet age· model years · decoded VINs
Average age
2024
Newest model yr
2007
Oldest model yr
VINs decoded
04
Operations & lanes
Revealed by inspection density across 4 states · 24 mo
Operating footprint· revealed by roadside-inspection geography
Operating radiusRegional
revealedStates observed33
US statesInspections · 24 mo1313
MN busiestInspection density by state· each tile = a state · shade = inspections, last 24 mo
Home base
LAKE ELMO, MN
Top corridor
MN
Density
fewermore
05
Network & fraud
Affiliated entities & reincarnation signals · for review, not a verdict
No shared-VIN flow in the last 12 months
None of this carrier's trucks were inspected under another USDOT in the last 12 months — any shared equipment is historical, not active.
Show all-time history (8 trucks · 10 carriers)
Across all inspections on record: USDOT 3955595USDOT 4167887USDOT 3974254USDOT 3766869USDOT 4168967USDOT 3734358USDOT 4072808USDOT 2640212
Capacity consistency· registered vs roadside-observed power units
Registered (MCS-150)11
Observed (24 mo)99
Shared w/ other carriers88
Roadside-observed power units materially exceed the registered MCS-150 fleet — confirm the carrier is operating within its filed capacity.
06
Identity & contact
FMCSA census + L&I dossier
Location
- Physical address
- 9395 4TH STREET N, LAKE ELMO, MN, 55042
- Operation
- Interstate
Contact
- Phone
- (904) 866-5337
- shadidisla@gmail.com
Registration
- Officer
- Shadi Disla Baez
- USDOT / docket
- 3945461 · MC-1466620
- First registered
- 08/31/2022
- Last MCS-150
- 04/27/2026 · 120,000 mi (2026)
- FMCSA safety rating
- Not rated
- Recordable crash rate
- 0.00
- D-U-N-S
- 116632292
Fleet (self-reported · MCS-150)
—CDL drivers
07
Federal activity
Daily-captured FMCSA licensing & insurance changes — monitored by Vektor
Federal record activity· monitored daily by Vektor
No licensing or insurance changes captured since Vektor began monitoring this carrier (June 2026). Quiet is usually good.
08
Reviews
Verified broker, shipper & driver reviews — moderated
Performance ratings only — never the Vektor risk score
No verified reviews yet
Be the first broker or shipper to rate LUXURY FLEURS INC. Reviews cover performance only — on-time delivery, payment speed, communication — and never affect the Vektor risk score.
Leave a review09
Frequently asked
What is LUXURY FLEURS INC's USDOT number?
LUXURY FLEURS INC's USDOT number is 3945461, and its motor carrier number is MC-1466620.
Is LUXURY FLEURS INC authorized to operate?
As of 2026-06-30, LUXURY FLEURS INC is active in the FMCSA register with common, contract, broker operating authority on file.
What is LUXURY FLEURS INC's safety record?
LUXURY FLEURS INC has a 12.5% vehicle out-of-service rate (national average 22.26%) across 17 roadside inspections, with 0 reportable crashes in the last 24 months, and is not currently rated by FMCSA. Vektor's computed risk score is 94/100 (tier: clear).
How big is LUXURY FLEURS INC's fleet?
LUXURY FLEURS INC operates 1 power unit and 1 driver per its most recent MCS-150 filing.
Where is LUXURY FLEURS INC based?
LUXURY FLEURS INC is based in LAKE ELMO, MN, with roadside inspections recorded across 4 states.